940 Get tutoring services at www.acemy-homework.com
Thoreau's concept of civil disobedience
Is Thoreau's concept of civil disobedience compatible with democratic government? Why or why not? What might Thoreau think about the role of government in today's society?
at least 250+ words
Uses at least 2 quotes from "Civil Disobedience”
2. Responds to two peers (100+ words each)
(1). Thoreau's concept of civil disobedience is not compatible with democratic government. Democracy only works when a community as a whole is able to pass laws by what the majority desires. Not everyone will refuse to pay taxes, like Thoreau did. It is going to take a lot of convincing to get everybody on the same page. Thoreau believes that a person should never tolerate a policy he or she did not want or agree with. Thoreau also states that protestors will most likely have to pay for their actions. If everyone were to disagree with a policy and take the consequences, jail is the only place for good people to be. Those who deny laws that they cannot tolerate will all take the punishment rather than standing by it and not fighting for it. I believe that not everyone will agree to punishments; therefore, causing society to fall apart. Majority must agree to fight for what they want and do not want and if some people are not willing to do it, civil disobedience is absolutely not compatible with the democratic government. Thoreau believes that by practicing civil disobedience, a person or group have the means of changing laws and protecting liberties within a democracy. It is up to individuals themselves to make a change in the government and it all starts with civil disobedience. Democracy will never be compatible with democracy because it is up to people and groups of people to fight and take consequences from disobeying laws they do not believe in.
(2). Thoreau’s concept of civil disobedience is both compatible and incompatible with the democratic government. The reason behind this is that it causes the breaking of laws and encouraging others to do the same. It also leads to how the government enforces the law to the people. In the democratic government such as the United States, the policy or law encourages people to rebel or protest against what is wrong. According to Thoreau’s work, he criticizes the social organizations and the laws of the US government such as the cause of the slavery and the civil war between the American and Mexico. This is seen as he refuses to pay a state poll tax and up being jailed for a night. Only a few patriots, heroes, martyrs, and reformers in the best sense assist people with integrities and end up being treated as state enemies. Thoreau insists that voting is not democratic and criticize that voting for the right is doing nothing for it. He says that voting goes with objections to representation and the majority rule, and strike is the core principle for democracy (Thoreau).
Thoreau would still protest for the things the government is doing which is not lawful. He would disagree with the modern government since the government is more interested in different things rather than people. He would spend most of the time in jail trying to fight for human rights and good services being delivered to the people by the government. Since he believed in something bigger and simplicity, he would be disappointed with the way the government enforces laws and the way we live.